This section examines the makeup of the city of Surprise relative to Maricopa County. Understanding how the community has grown and the demographic makeup of its residents will help to define the needs of the community today and in the future. (See chart below)
| City of Surprise Population History (population/ decades 1960- current) | |
| Census Year | Population Count |
| 1960 | 1,000 |
| 1970 | 2,427 |
| 1980 | 3,723 |
| 1990 | 7,122 |
| 2000 | 30,848 |
| 2008 (March) | 107,593 |
Table 2.1A- Source: US Census, City of Surprise- Community Development
Over the last decade the city of Surprise has experienced a substantial increase in population. The population increased from 30,848 residents in 2000 to 107,593 in March of 2008. The growth rate of Surprise consistently outpaces that of Maricopa County. While the city is not expected to sustain this rapid growth rate, it is anticipated to approach nearly 400,000 people by the year 2030. This dynamic presents challenges in providing public services and infrastructure to a rapidly expanding population.
| City of Surprise Annexation History (Map 2.1A) (sq. miles/ decades 1960 - current) | ||
| Year | Acres | Square Miles |
| 1961 | 667 | 1.04 |
| 1970 | 667 | 1.04 |
| 1980 | 2,783 | 4.35 |
| 1990 | 38,672 | 60.43 |
| 2000 | 46,066 | 71.98 |
| 2008 (March) | 60,006 | 93.76 |
Table 2.1B - Source: City of Surprise- Community Development
Along with robust population growth, Surprise is expected to experience continued annual growth in households for several years. It is anticipated that households in Surprise will increase 16 percent between 2000 and 2010. The long-term level of households is projected to reach 179,081 by 2030. The city of Surprise’s household growth rate far outpaces the annualized growth rate of Maricopa County, which will result in Surprise possessing a larger proportion of households in Maricopa County than its present level. Over the same time period, the average household size in Surprise is projected to increase from 2.0 to 2.5. The increase in household size can be attributed to the influx of families moving into Surprise, which is diminishing the dominance of retirement communities.
| Population, Housing and Household Size for Surprise and Maricopa County | ||||||
| 2005-2030 | ||||||
| Year | Surprise Population | Surprise Housing Units | Household Size | Maricopa Co. Population | Maricopa Co. Housing Units | Household Size |
| 2005 | 93,356 | 42,430 | 2.49 | 3,681,025 | 1,479,767 | 2.20 |
| 2010 | 146,890 | 64,039 | 2.60 | 4,216,499 | 1,685,134 | 2.29 |
| 2020 | 268,359 | 117,815 | 2.55 | 5,230,300 | 2,104,440 | 2.28 |
| 2030 | 401,458 | 179,081 | 2.50 | 6,135,000 | 2,502,040 | 2.24 |
Table 2.1C - Source: MAG, May 2007
The racial and ethnic make up of Surprise has changed considerably over the last 15 years. The White population increased 27 percent and “Some Other Race” declined 33 percent. During this same timeframe the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity declined by 35 percent.
![]()
![]()
![]()
| Population by Race and Ethnicity | ||||||
| Surprise, 1990-2006 | ||||||
| 1990 | 2000 | 2006 | ||||
| Race |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | 7,122 | 100.0% | 30,848 | 100.0% | 103,402 | 100.0% |
| White | 3,896 | 54.7% | 26,521 | 86.0% | 78,926 | 76.3% |
| Black or African American Alone | 113 | 1.6% | 806 | 2.6% | 4,660 | 4.5% |
| American Indian/Alaska Native | 37 | 0.5% | 134 | 0.4% | 623 | 0.6% |
| Asian alone* | --- | --- | 329 | 1.1% | 2,224 | 2.2% |
| Hawaiian/Pacific | 9 | 0.1% | 16 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% |
| Some other race | 3,067 | 43.1% | 2,427 | 7.9% | 14,534 | 14.1% |
| Two or more races | --- | --- | 615 | 2.0% | 2,435 | 2.4% |
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| Hispanic or Latina | 3,916 | 55.0% | 7,184 | 23.3% | 21,437 | 20.7% |
Table 2.1D - Source: US Census 1990, 2000, American Community Survey 2006
The city of Surprise has experienced changes within the age distribution of its residents since 1990, which provides challenges to city planners in keeping up with the development of schools and parks. The overall percentage of the 65 and over age cohort has declined, while the “less than 19” and “25 to 34” years of age cohorts have increased. However, the 55 and older age cohort still maintains a high percentage of the overall Surprise population, providing an opportunity to expand the healthcare and life sciences employment sectors.
Likewise, the median age for the city of Surprise has undergone dramatic changes since 1990. The median age rose from 33.0 to 46.1 between 1990 and 2000 as retirement communities located in Surprise. However, between 2000 and 2006 there was an influx of people 19 to 34 years of age moving to Surprise, which reduced the median age to 36 years. This compares more closely to Maricopa County overall, as the county median has slowly risen from 32.0 to 33.6 between 1990 and 2005. Overall, Surprise now possesses a more balanced age distribution in the population, and an opportunity to expand the employment base.

Figure 2.1A - Source: US Census 1990, 2000, American Community Survey 2006

The Surprise labor force has experienced modest growth between the years 2000 and 2005. Both Surprise and Maricopa County account for a 2.5 percent average annual growth rate in the gross level of the labor force. Over the last five years the city’s unemployment rate has increased slightly, which tracks closely with the overall unemployment rate in Maricopa County.
| Workforce Growth Rate | ||||||
| Surprise & Maricopa County, 2000-2005 | ||||||
| Surprise Table Header | Maricopa County | |||||
| Workforce | % Growth | Workforce | % Growth | |||
| 2000 | 11,771 | --- | 1,595,203 | --- | ||
| 2001 | 12,197 | 3.6% | 1,649,235 | 3.4% | ||
| 2002 | 12,550 | 2.9% | 1,690,234 | 2.5% | ||
| 2003 | 12,750 | 1.6% | 1,719,116 | 1.7% | ||
| 2004 | 13,071 | 2.5% | 1,766,167 | 2.7% | ||
| 2005 | 13,549 | 3.7% | 1,832,453 | 3.8% | ||
| Avg. Annual Growth | 2.5% | 0.2% | 2.5% | 2.2% | ||
Table 2.1E- Source: DES 2005
| City of Surprise Unemployment Rate 2000 and 2005 | ||||||
| Surprise Table Header | Maricopa County | |||||
| Employment | 2000 | 2005 | 2000 | 2005 | ||
| Persons Employed | 11,281 | 12,857 | 1,542,696 | 1,758,207 | ||
| Persons Not in Labor Force | 490 | 692 | 52,507 | 74,246 | ||
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2% | 5.1% | 3.3% | 4.1% | ||
Table 2.1F - Source: DES 2005
The business establishments and employment for Surprise are very concentrated in the construction and retail trade sectors. While the two sectors show moderate shares of the business establishments, their employment percentages are disproportionately higher than the level of establishments in the community. These two sectors account for 42.4 percent of all employment in Surprise, while accounting for 29.6 percent of all business establishments. Comparatively these two sectors account for 19.7 percent of employment and 23.1 percent of business establishments in Maricopa County. The occupational mix within the city of Surprise shows similarities to that of Maricopa County. Occupations that have the largest representation in Surprise include Sales and Office Occupations, Management, Professional and Related Occupations, and Service Occupations. The combined total of these occupational groupings represents 78 percent of all Surprise occupations, which is the same as for Maricopa County.
| Business Establishments and Employment by Sector | ||||||
| Surprise and Maricopa County, 2006 | ||||||
| Surprise | Maricopa County | |||||
| Industry Classification | % of Total Est. | % of Total Emp. | % of Total Est. | % of Total Emp. | ||
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | ||
| Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining | --- | 0.0% | --- | 0.5% | ||
| Construction | --- | 12.0% | --- | 11.5% | ||
| Manufacturing | --- | 5.9% | --- | 8.6% | ||
| Wholesale trade | --- | 2.2% | --- | 3.3% | ||
| Retail trade | --- | 12.7% | --- | 12.0% | ||
| Transportation and warehousing, and utilities | --- | 5.5% | --- | 5.1% | ||
| Information | --- | 1.4% | --- | 2.2% | ||
| Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing | --- | 9.5% | --- | 10.2% | ||
| rofessional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services | --- | 9.5% | --- | 12.2% | ||
| Educational services, and health care, and social assistance | --- | 20.7% | --- | 16.7% | ||
| Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation, and food services | --- | 8.4% | --- | 9.2% | ||
| Other services, except public administration | --- | 4.9% | --- | 4.5% | ||
| Public administration | --- | 7.2% | --- | 3.9% | ||
Table 2.1G - Source: US Census, American Community Survey 2006
| Employment by Occupation, Age 16 and Over Surprise and Maricopa County, 2006 | ||||||
| Surprise | Maricopa County | |||||
| Count | Percent | Count | Percent | |||
| Total | 43,311 | 100.0% | 1,801,281 | 100.0% | ||
| Management, professional, and related occupations | 13,332 | 30.8% | 608,073 | 33.8% | ||
| Service occupations | 9,020 | 20.8% | 287,952 | 16.0% | ||
| Sales and office occupations | 11,158 | 25.8% | 509,867 | 28.3% | ||
| Farming, fishing, and forestry occupations | 0 | 0.0% | 4,672 | 0.3% | ||
| Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair occupations | 5,346 | 12.3% | 215,171 | 11.9% | ||
| Production, transportation, and material moving occupations | 4,455 | 10.3% | 175,546 | 9.7% | ||
Table 2.1H - Source: US Census, American Community Survey 2006
| City of Surprise Employment by Type | ||||||
| 2005 and Build-out | ||||||
| 2005 | % | Build-out | % | |||
| Retail | 5,185 | 31.8% | 49,260 | 21.6% | ||
| Office | 719 | 4.4% | 90,680 | 39.7% | ||
| Industrial | 796 | 4.9% | 70,260 | 30.7% | ||
| Public | 2,524 | 15.5% | 11,660 | 5.1% | ||
| Other | 7,065 | 43.4% | 6,640 | 2.9% | ||
| Total | 16,289 | 100.0% | 228,500 | 100.0% | ||
Table 2.1I - Source: MAG Projections 2007
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) provides an analysis of employment within the city of Surprise based on Socio-economic Analysis Zones (SAZ). Their data indicates a decline in the number of jobs associated with the retail sector from 55.1 percent in 2004 to 21.6 percent at build-out. Alternatively, the city is expected to experience a 27.1 percent increase in office jobs from 12.6 percent to 39.7 percent, and a nearly 20 percent increase in industrial jobs from 11 percent to 30.7 percent.
Since 1990, the median household income for Surprise residents has more than doubled, rising to nearly $60,190 per household in 2006. This income is almost 7.5 percent higher than the Maricopa County median household income of $52,521.
Roughly 43.3 percent of households earned between $50,000 and $100,000 in 2006. The largest proportion of Surprise households (24.6 percent) earned between $50,000 and $75,000 in 2006. Conversely, in Maricopa County as a whole, only 33.3 percent of its residents made between $50,000 and $100,000. However, the largest proportion of its households (18.7 percent) fell into a higher income bracket – $75,000 to $100,000 – in 2006.

Figure 2.1C - Source: US Census, 2006 American Community Survey
Only 15 percent of households in Surprise earned an income under that of the national poverty line in 2006. More than 15 percent of households in Maricopa County, as a whole, fell below the poverty line in that same year.
Figure 2.1D - Source: US Census, 2006 American Community Survey
| City of Surprise | ||||||
| Educational Attainment (Persons 25 and Older) | ||||||
| Surprise | Maricopa County | |||||
| 1990 | 2000 | 2006 | 1990 | 2000 | 2006 | |
| Less than H.S Diploma | 47.8% | 15.0% | 10.0% | 18.5% | 17.5% | 16.0% |
| H.S. Diploma | 24.3% | 28.9% | 26.5% | 25.5% | 23.1% | 25.3% |
| A.A. Degree or Some College | 20.4% | 35.7% | 36.5% | 33.9% | 33.5% | 31.0% |
| Bachelors Degree or Higher | 7.5% | 20.5% | 26.9% | 22.1% | 25.9% | 27.8% |
Table 2.1J - Source: US Census, American Community Survey 2006
The level of educational attainment that the Surprise population exhibits is very similar to that of Maricopa County. In 2006, 26.5 percent of the population had a high school diploma and 64 percent had earned an Associates Degree or higher. While Surprise exhibits a higher rate of high school graduates than Maricopa County, they also exhibit lower levels of individuals possessing a bachelor’s degree or higher. This dynamic suggests the availability of a qualified labor force to support expanding manufacturing and industrial sectors. While bio-tech and other industries remain employment targets, a higher level of graduate or professional degrees would assist in attracting these specific industries.